Everything is Relative
Lori Bielen Women Writers and Feminist Theory
Response to “Recitatif” by Toni Morrison
After I finished reading the short story “Recitatif” by Toni Morrison, I was left with some unanswered questions, but not one of those questions was which one of the characters was the Black woman and which one was the White. I immediately assumed Twyla was the Black woman, primarily because the story was told by Twyla in first person narrative, and being that Toni Morrison is a Black woman, then Twyla must be Black as well. After reading the supplementary essay “Black Writing, White Reading” by Elizabeth Abel, my jaw nearly dropped to the floor. You can imagine how stupid I felt for making such a narrow minded assumption.
Unfortunately, now I can not differentiate whether my assumption that Twyla was the Black woman influenced the rest of my reading of the short story, or if the rest of the story proved my theory that Twyla must be the Black woman to be true, but I never once doubted or had to think twice about who was who in the story. For example, in the scene where the mothers come to visit St. Bonny’s, Twyla’s mother is portrayed as the embarrassing mother, with a very loud and obnoxious voice and pants that are way too tight, and Roberta’s mother is the religious mother who thinks she is better than Twyla’s mother and refuses to even shake her hand. This superior attitude displayed by Roberta’s mother is a typical reaction to the actions of Black women by White women that have been demonstrated numerous times throughout history, film, and literature. That is why it made perfect sense to me and I didn’t second guess it.
Another reason why I was certain Twyla was the Black character and Roberta was White also took place in the scene where the mothers visit. Roberta’s mother brought an enormous spread of food for lunch including chicken legs and ham, and Twyla’s mother did not bring anything. Twyla tries to make sense of this when she says, “The wrong food is always with the wrong people. Maybe that’s why I got into waitress work later-to match up the right people with the right food.” I assumed that because chicken legs and ham are stereotypically referred to as “soul food”, and yet it is Roberta’s mom who brought it, must be why Twyla says that it is the wrong food with the wrong people. In other words, she should be eating that food, not Roberta. Now I realize it is just because Roberta did not appreciate the food and just let the chicken legs sit there, and Twyla would have greatly enjoyed that lunch.
What Morrison did in this short story, by never disclosing which race either woman was, was sheer brilliance. Every one of the stereotypes mentioned in the story, such as pink scalloped socks, tight green slacks, and the adoration of Jimi Hendrix, could have been true for either of the women, regardless of their race. She displays how the divide between the races has a lot to do with how Blacks and Whites define themselves in opposition to one another, which Roberta and Twyla both do throughout the story. They go from being very close friends to strangers with absolutely nothing in common in just a few years. In the supplementary essay, Abel makes an excellent point which helped my reading of the story when she says, “By forcing us to construct racial categories by highly ambiguous social cues, “Recitatif” elicits and exposes the unarticulated racial codes that operate at the boundaries of consciousness.” My interpretation of this is that everything is relative, and until you have been in someone else’s shoes or have seen a situation through their eyes, you can not possibly understand what they have been through or how they may see things. Yet by building friendships like these two women have, we can certainly try to understand each other a little bit better.
April 4, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I had the same experience when I read Morrison’s “Recitatif”. Had it not been for Able’s essay and our class discussions, I probably wouldn’t have even questioned what I now realize was an assumption about Twyla and Roberta’s race. I made the same analysis of the events in the story to also conclude that Twyla was Black and Roberta was White. What seemingly solidified my assumption was the scene where mothers were protesting desegregation. However, when I went back to re-read the scene I realized that nothing was mentioned about race. Both Twyla and Roberta were simply concerned with the fact that their children would have to go to new schools.
I agree with you, Morrison’s story was sheer brilliance! One can read the story and be completely convinced that Twyla is of X race and Roberta is of Y race… but when one goes back to re-read the story and validate their assumption they see that there is no substantial evidence to support the idea that Twyla is definitely X and Roberta is definitely Y. Morrison’s story reveals how biased we may be without even realizing it. I don’t think Morrison meant to judge her readers for having these biases, but aimed to expose how certain ideas about race are ingrained in us. Once we accept that idea we can think more critically to better separate fact from fiction when it comes to race.
May 10, 2009 at 12:31 am
Abel and Morrison both portray the importance of politics while interpreting a text. Abel wants to know what is means for white feminists to read black feminist texts. She compares it to slavery, in terms of black women raising white children (page 832). The purpose of this comparison is to explain the nurturing aspect of the black woman. Therefore, incorporating black women broadens the feminist movement in terms of writing. Morrison making her characters racially ambiguous forces the reader to use the text as a device that interlinks racism and sexism for the sake of having a deeper understanding into what it means to put people into societal groupings and what connotations society allows those groups to have. But I don’t think I would have come up with any of this on my own. It’s always interesting to see what kinds of things books will make you come up with. Able def helped me understand the book.
May 10, 2009 at 6:42 am
I think it is a brilliant ploy by Morrison to make us look at our own attitudes toward race by not assigning racial roles in the story. I thought the story shifted from each character identifying with another race at different times in their lives. There was no defining moment for either character. Too many times we are not aware of how deeply ingrained our attitudes and outlook can be even though we work constantly on ourselves to stay attuned to each situation. An exercise of this sort will affect our perspective as readers, in our work environment and as we interact with our families and people in our general lives.
May 15, 2009 at 10:39 pm
Toni Morrison’s short story is brilliantly written and she forces readers to assume the race of Twyla and Roberta. Like you,I assumed that Twyla was black and Roberta was white. I read through the story and was convinced of the fact. Most of the points that you highlighted about the race of both girls are some of the areas that I picked up on. Morrison never really reveals the race of both girls in the story. I agree that her writing is one if sheer brilliance. She is able to place lots of details in the story and have her readers make their own interpretation. After reading Abel’s essay, I was still a bit hesitant to changing my perception of the race of each girl.
Great job on your essay.